October 21st, 2009
The War I would fight
The war I am willing to fight
Due to the state of the world and my pro-America stance I am often asked by both students and detractors “why don’t you fight or what war would you fight?” After much thought I have decided it would be worth the risk to spell out my individual policy on war, how I would fight said war and where I think the struggle really is that leads to the result of actual war. My policy on war is a simple one attack me in any way that is a threat to me or mine and you cease to exist. Not liking me is not a reason for me to attack anyone, being liked or accepted means nothing to me. Thinking I am wrong is not a reason for me to go to war lots of people do not like me and there are many I don’t like. Not being liked or not being seen as right is no reason to go to war. The only reason to engage in war is to eliminate a threat to one’s life. So much for my policy on war I hope that is clear.
The war I would fight is one against any foe foreign or domestic that means to end my life or the lives of those I care about. If I were to engage in war I would slay the enemy and all that support said enemy in fact every man, woman and child of the enemy until the enemy chose to or could not keep the war going. In my war there would be no quarter asked and if asked for by the enemy not given. The shrines of the enemy would be destroyed. It would not be the job of my army to rebuild as we progress in war, nor would I give money and so on for food for the “victims” of war left in the wake of my army, not when we have those who are hungry in my country who are not at war with me or mine. If the founds spent on charity toward the enemy and that includes such acts as building schools were spent on the actual war our men would be paid what they are worth and the people would not have to be over taxed as they are now.
If battle is to be engaged in at all it must be done so in the image of nature ruthless and without any pretense of empathy. Half measures only prolong suffering on all sides when in fact all out war is the best causal example for peace there is. If one must attack it should be with the resolve that the aftermath matters not. If those in battle second guess themselves or have to kowtow to governments who give them a mission and then second guess them every step of the way those in battle will hesitate to act and to do so in battle is to die. War is not a thing in its self, it’s a result and echo of stresses being allowed to build up and letting wrongs go unaddressed for too long. If we listen to our foes and are prepared to prove them wrong we can avoid war more often than not but any willingness to listen must be balanced by an equal knowledge that any attack will be met with utter annihilation of the enemy. I seek no war personally with any on Earth, given a chance I’d vote for live and let live. The live and let live idea only works if all agree to terms and that is not likely ever to occur so instead of plan A I have to opt for plan B which is live and let live or cease to exist.
People can hate anyone they choose, feel anyway they want about anything they wish it is what they do with those feelings or thoughts that matters to me. Agree with me or not I welcome all but endanger me or mine and you think the gates of Hell have opened against you and all you hold dear.